Pictures provided by: bh
Also known as:
Author | Message |
---|---|
◊ 2010-11-14 18:57 |
I don't know if the ratio is correct |
◊ 2010-11-14 19:01 |
No, it's not correct: pictures are too flat |
◊ 2010-11-15 06:42 |
The original ratio was even further off (from Youtube). I guess they needed to be even taller? |
◊ 2010-11-15 09:42 |
640 x 480 (not 400) |
◊ 2010-11-15 14:06 |
I tried 480. It stretched them way too far the other way. A few are at 440, but others looked too tall even there. Maybe they needed to be 420? |
◊ 2010-11-15 18:09 |
Current ratio seems good to me (it is already 4:3 anyway, so 640x480 would give the same but with lower quality due to unnecessary zoom) -- Last edit: 2010-11-15 18:10:31 |
◊ 2010-11-15 22:20 |
I obviously adjusted them before validate all, and I have resized the pictures because are from Youtobe and 640x480 means bad quality |
◊ 2010-11-16 08:19 |
Don't we discourage captures from youtube? At least "unofficially?" |
◊ 2010-11-16 08:30 |
I've got to admit, that I have posted captures of one movie and one TV show that I took from YouTube. I didn't know that it was illegal though. The captures of this movie look good enough for me, I've certainly seen worse. |
◊ 2010-11-16 14:32 |
"from youtube" does not imply bad quality. If the source of the video uploaded was good, and that you download the video instead of making captures of the one embedded on the site, you get good results. e.g. for /movie_1004511488-Rick-Ross--Aston-Martin-Music.html the captures are "from youtube" |
◊ 2017-07-20 16:31 |
Ambulance |