Advertising

Last completed movie pages

Men with Wings; 父からの手紙; DIG; My Giant; Der Tod läuft hinterher; 초미의 관심사; 메기; Uncertain Glory; Curse of the Witching Tree; 꿈보다 해몽; 여의도; Посол Советского Союза; Kansas City Bomber; Algérie, terre française; Target 200; (more...)

1988 Ford LTS-Series

1988 Ford LTS-Series in The Highwayman, TV Series, 1988 IMDB Ep. 1.06

Class: Trucks, Trailer truck (tractor) — Model origin: US

1988 Ford LTS-Series

[*][*][*] Vehicle used by a character or in a car chase

Comments about this vehicle

AuthorMessage

Reg1992 US

◊ 2017-08-19 00:39

 LN-Series?

DarthCain US

◊ 2017-08-24 10:39

 That's not an LN. With those sunk-in head lights, I believe its an LS or LTS if its a tandem.

-- Last edit: 2017-08-24 11:18:38

mike962 DE

◊ 2017-08-24 17:52
DarthCain wrote That's not an LN. With those sunk-in head lights, I believe its an LS or LTS if its a tandem.

tandem rear axles

GTO 990

◊ 2017-08-26 12:34

 LTS

eLMeR MH

◊ 2017-08-27 18:07

 Front face of a set-back front axle LS indeed. With a 1988-95 grille.

@ mike962:
Same as often: why not providing a picture of what you claim? For now, nothing shows the tandem rear axle...

-- Last edit: 2017-08-27 18:08:14

mike962 DE

◊ 2017-08-27 19:48
eLMeR wrote Front face of a set-back front axle LS indeed. With a 1988-95 grille.

@ mike962:
Same as often: why not providing a picture of what you claim? For now, nothing shows the tandem rear axle...

isn't my word good enough ????? [:kiki]

when I say tandem it is tandem
[Image: untitled.2142.jpg]

-- Last edit: 2017-08-27 19:49:57

eLMeR MH

◊ 2017-08-27 20:23
mike962 wrote
isn't my word good enough ????? [...]

Most probably enough for some others, but not for me. You want us, contributors, to help you identifying vehicles, and us, admins, to validate your proposals? Then do a small part of the job by providing useful pictures with enough details.

This said, thanks for the picture.

mike962 DE

◊ 2017-08-27 20:30
eLMeR wrote
Most probably enough for some others, but not for me. You want us, contributors, to help you identifying vehicles, and us, admins, to validate your proposals? Then do a small part of the job by providing useful pictures with enough details.

This said, thanks for the picture.

dear admin why the BEEP is this not named already

/vehicle.php?id=1060737

by your own definition that contribuitor didn't do "small part of the job by providing useful pictures with enough details"

-- Last edit: 2017-08-27 20:35:25

eLMeR MH

◊ 2017-08-27 21:19

 Why is the other vehicle not validated? At first, because we don't live 24/7 in front of our computers? Certainly also because we have more important to do than validating useless background vehicles which nobody cares about? And most probably because we don't share your "unknown-phobia", so a 2-day waiting period doesn't sounds as "end of the world" as it seems to do for you? :D

-- Last edit: 2017-08-27 21:20:08

mike962 DE

◊ 2017-08-27 21:22
eLMeR wrote Why is the other vehicle not validated? At first, because we don't live 24/7 in front of our computers? Certainly also because we have more important to do than validating useless background vehicles which nobody cares about?


then why the heck are they even submited if nobody cares about ??? it's it totally illogical and moronic ?


-- Last edit: 2017-08-27 21:57:49

mike962 DE

◊ 2017-08-27 21:29

 and BTW ELMER make up your dam mind already

if I say poorly visibble background vehicle should be deleted you all say NO like this one
/vehicle_866209.html

and now you say

Quote validating useless background vehicles which nobody cares about



so what the heck is it then ?

-- Last edit: 2017-08-27 21:31:04

antp BE

◊ 2017-08-27 22:00
mike962 wrote
isn't my word good enough ?????

Sometimes you post a bunch of useless pics, so when a pic is useful (like here, it is a good additional view of the vehicle) it is surprising not to have it :p

mike962 wrote

then why the heck are they even submited if nobody cares about ??? it's it totally illogical and moronic ?

and sorry you are admins , it's your JOB to look and solve unknowns otherwise don't bother to be admins

either do something properly or just get out

Even if you edited your message the post above was already seen by several admins
Your attitude upsets many admins, at some point I'll not be able to defend you :p
(also, it is not with such attitude that admins will be happy to check/rename the identifications that you post...)

You always take examples comparing cases of background vehicles, but you still do not seem to understand that it is not so easy to draw the line on what is OK and what is not, depending on
- how it is seen in the movie (well noticeable)
- the potential interest of the vehicle
- the amount of vehicles in the movie
- who validates (and even his mood at that moment)
- same for judging if it could stay or if it should be deleted

-- Last edit: 2017-08-27 22:03:47

mike962 DE

◊ 2017-08-27 22:05
Quote to do than validating useless background vehicles which nobody cares about


doesn't this insult the contribuitors and even the admins who validate such vehicles then ?

say Raul by this saying uploaded a useless background vehicle that nobody cares about like this one
/vehicle_61653-Ford-A-62.html

nevermind someone like me to bothers to search for them ?



-- Last edit: 2017-08-27 22:15:46

antp BE

◊ 2017-08-27 23:15

 That was more than ten years ago, due to the low number of entries on the site back then we didn't yet really had rules :p

-- Last edit: 2017-08-27 23:15:40

Add a comment

Advertising

Watch or buy this title - Powered by JustWatch

Advertising