Class: Cars, Hatchback — Model origin:
Minor action vehicle or used in only a short scene
Author | Message |
---|---|
◊ 2008-03-17 00:24 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
◊ 2008-03-17 00:24 |
To regroup. |
◊ 2008-03-17 09:32 |
Not really this one is older than the other one - 1993. |
◊ 2008-03-17 11:54 |
It didnt get any facelifts until 1999, this is exactly the same as the other one. |
◊ 2008-03-17 11:56 |
Sorry CCF, but it is not true - look at the bumper, the silver one had them in one piece and they are more round. 1993: http://www.araconline.com/ir/075412563095040_3.jpg 1996/97: http://www.vw-audi-specialists.co.uk/now_breaking/seat_ibiza-se.jpg -- Last edit: 2008-03-17 11:59:22 |
◊ 2008-03-17 12:04 |
Adding a rubber to the bumper is a facelift? i'd say no, the real facelift was for the 1999 one ![]() |
◊ 2008-03-17 12:12 |
Not only the rubber, but the entire bumpers are different, the old ones were made from two parts. The Xantia with new logo's position is maybe indeed not a very face lifted car, but for sure a different m.y., so theoretically deserves for a new page. -- Last edit: 2008-03-17 12:18:35 |
◊ 2008-03-17 12:29 |
Depends how much it is visible. If this one had no role it would not deserve a separate page. |
◊ 2008-03-17 12:33 |
I dont think it really counts as a "new" one, i'd list it with the other one. |
◊ 2008-03-17 12:40 |
Well of course you can do what you want. ![]() |
◊ 2008-03-17 13:11 |
I just gave my opinion, up to Antoine to decide ![]() |
◊ 2008-03-17 14:56 |
Rather the other one with this one then, as it has a role. But since this one has a role and the other one is well visible, and that both are different years, it is not much a problem to list them separately. |