Class: Cars, Convertible — Model origin:
00:09:20 Minor action vehicle or used in only a short scene
Author | Message |
---|---|
◊ 2023-05-19 22:04 |
'32 Buick |
◊ 2023-05-19 22:44 |
|
◊ 2023-05-20 00:00 |
List of 1932 Buick models - Link to "www.oldcarbrochures.com" |
◊ 2023-05-20 19:28 |
I count 6 flaps in the hood, but even the Buick Series 90 only had 5. I think it's a 1932 Cadillac V-8 355-B or V-12 370-B (but not a V-16, which had 7 flaps). |
◊ 2023-05-21 00:03 |
Hm, didn't see that last flap, looked like part of the headlight. I only now notice that the banner should wrap otherwise around the grille shell were it a Buick. |
◊ 2023-05-21 00:49 |
I'm crushed. I thought Lateef was infallible. |
◊ 2023-05-21 01:29 |
Blimey, the details you guys pick on make it hard for us amateurs to supply useful images... Here is a shot with all six flaps visible: |
◊ 2023-05-21 11:49 |
You enjoy making these sarcastic remarks, how about you learn from your mistakes and better your own identifications instead of breaking my chops? |
◊ 2023-05-21 13:01 |
Oh I admit to having a sarcastic sense of humor. What I said is not even close to being sarcastic. I said it because you are never wrong. It just proves that you are human like the rest of us. |
◊ 2023-05-21 15:30 |
Not sarcastic? Saying 'you're crushed' when you're really not, implying that I'm not human because I don't make mistakes, even saying flat out that I'm never wrong? Sure, buddy. I make mistakes all right, but the difference between you and me is that I learn from every mistake I make, and I acknowledge the mistakes I make every time I do, and I'm always looking for new areas to expand my knowledge. Broadening the horizon, now that's a keyword. As for you, it doesn't seem like you are willing or able to advance past the bare minimum of effort when it comes to identification. It's more or less at a standstill. |