Advertising

Last completed movie pages

Mob Cops; Где наши деньги?; Presque légal; مدينة الملاهي; Who Is the Black Dahlia?; Коктебель; 母のおもかげ; El jardinero; Ogifta par ...en film som skiljer sig; Zig Zag Story; 農家の嫁　三十五歳、スカートの風; Il sesso della strega; Bubbles; Quand vient l'automne; 新宿少年探偵団; (more...)

1966 Ford LTD 4-door Hardtop [57F]

1966 Ford LTD [57F] in The Addams Family, TV Series, 1964-1966 IMDB Ep. 2.21

Class: Cars, Sedan — Model origin: US

1966 Ford LTD 4-door Hardtop [57F]

[*][*] Minor action vehicle or used in only a short scene 

Comments about this vehicle

AuthorMessage

electra225 IT

◊ 2023-07-20 09:42

 1965 for sure.
Could this be a Galaxie 500 4 door hardtop ? or a LTD ?

-- Last edit: 2023-07-20 09:42:29

night cub US

◊ 2023-07-20 10:05

 I think it's an LTD with the round badge on the C-pillar

supcoach US

◊ 2023-07-20 13:24

 1965 model

Ford Galaxie 500 LTD 4-door hardtop sedan Link to "www.oldcarbrochures.com"

Link to "th.bing.com"

Lateef NO

◊ 2023-07-20 13:30

 It's a 1966 LTD. Galaxie 500 prefix was dropped starting that year.

electra225 IT

◊ 2023-07-20 20:36

 I have the impression this is a '65 judjing by the tail lights which are more vertical than in '66. Do you agree ?

Lateef NO

◊ 2023-07-20 20:48

 You can save yourself a lot of trouble by comparing the body panels. On the 1965, there's a recess in the middle that goes from the front to the rear.
On the 1966, however, the recess stops at the rear door, and there's a lower recess on the rear fender, as seen on subject car.

electra225 IT

◊ 2023-07-21 00:19

 OK, I apreciate a lot your comment about something I never noticed, but... what about the tail lights ? Do you mean that it is just an impression ?

-- Last edit: 2023-07-21 00:21:14

electra225 IT

◊ 2023-07-21 00:22

 It is not a trouble for me. I don't understand this kind of expression by you.
Thanks got I am just interested about cars and it is not a trouble for me to have a doubt about something.

-- Last edit: 2023-07-21 00:24:44

Lateef NO

◊ 2023-07-21 11:51

 I evaded your remark about the taillights deliberately as the body panels are (to me) a much easier way of identifying the year in general. That's what I mean by 'saving yourself the trouble'.
Now, to talk about the taillights for a minute: no. I do not agree. The gap between the bumper and the taillight edge should be much narrower if it were a 1965.

electra225 IT

◊ 2023-07-21 15:25

 You are right because of the side shape. After all the tail lights are not enough identifiable by this photo.
Thank you

Add a comment

Advertising

Watch or buy this title via JustWatch

Advertising