Author | Message |
---|---|
◊ 2009-04-06 14:17 |
What an ugly car. Crossing between a Mazda 626 Wagon an a Toyota Carina Wagon an maybe a little Civic... |
◊ 2009-04-06 14:33 |
Like everything, taste on cars is very personal, but even if so, what's there to make this car ugly? i mean, it's a normal nineties wagon like many others, no? i like it |
◊ 2009-04-07 09:28 |
Well I don't find it exactly ugly neither, maybe unitresting or very ordinary.. |
◊ 2009-04-07 16:29 |
Inconsiderable. A car, which looks like a plenty of others. Nothing, you will remember later, not even if you have owned one. |
◊ 2009-04-07 17:37 |
This one like for the mid-90's Japanese cars isn't so bad (at least from this angle). Toyotas, Nissans etc. were in those times still round and nauseous. This similar to it 626 was introduced at the end of 1997. -- Last edit: 2009-04-07 17:40:39 |
◊ 2009-04-07 19:22 |
... |
◊ 2024-08-17 02:37 |
The little square logo next to the Orthia badge means this is either an Orthia V or an Orthia P, one of two Orthia versions intended to be sold under Honda's various dealer chains. These could be identified by their taillights and this one is an Orthia P, similar to this one, as its rear turn signals are clear, as opposed to the amber-coloured ones on the Orthia V. Of note, Japanese Wikipedia says that these separate versions were dropped after about a year and all Orthias took on the Orthia V's appearance, so the only way to distinguish a 1997+ model from a 1996-1997 V would be by looking at the tailgate. However, this one is most definitely an Orthia P thanks to the taillights. Of note, "P" is part of the model name and not a trim level; I think Honda was doing something similar to what Toyota did with several of its models, such as the RAV4 J and RAV4 L. |