Class: Others, Military armored vehicle — Model origin:
Minor action vehicle or used in only a short scene
Author | Message |
---|---|
◊ 2006-02-22 21:40 |
This is a landing craft of some kind. You can see the front just beginning to open. |
◊ 2006-02-22 23:45 |
The opening front is an optical illusion provided by the rather dark picture. On the picture you see two landing vehicle tanks used by the US Marine Corps entering the beach. Those are FMC AAV7P1 (Assault Amphibian Vehicle), with gun towers. Their brother is the LVT P7 (Landing Vehicle, Tracked). See http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/aavp7a1.htm and also /vehicle.php?id=14230 The two helicopters above are of the UH-60 Blackhawk family. |
◊ 2006-02-23 00:15 |
Produced by the FMC Corporation in 1983 these vehicles were at first known as LVTP7 (Landing Vehicle, Tracked) until in 1985 the US Marine Corps changed the designation to AAVP7A1 (Assault Amphibian Vehicle Personnel). Only the name was changed, nothing else. In 1998 the vehicles were upgraded with a new engine and running gear and since called AAVP7A1 (RAM/RS). That is the version we see here. |
◊ 2006-02-23 00:24 |
You are correct. I watched the scene again and the troops do seem to come out of the back. The scene switched so fast that I missed it. Thanks. |
◊ 2006-02-24 23:26 |
Who removed '(RAM/RS)'? That is part of the name. |
◊ 2006-02-24 23:47 |
I remember having inserted a space after "AAV" because on the linked page they use that separately from the 7P1. If at the same time you added "(RAM/RS)" your change may have been lost. But why put that between "(...)" ? |
◊ 2006-02-25 00:28 |
The brackets are actually being used by the military people. That are acronyms that resulted from the "reliability, availability, and maintainability upgrade" (RAM) and the "rebuild to standard" (RS) retrofit. If it were only a change in some nuts and bolts it would not matter, but with this upgrade the tank got a whole new running gear. If you look closely you can see the track support rollers which were not used on the older version. Therefore I think it is okay to give this long name and the new year. |