Author | Message |
---|---|
◊ 2011-01-03 18:59 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Real funny that they blew up an older truck instead. By my calculations, wouldn't it be a lot cheaper to destroy a younger Ford? Ah, well. I guess it's a 1969? |
◊ 2011-01-03 19:07 |
1967 Ford F-250. |
◊ 2011-01-04 04:52 |
These trucks are actually pretty cheap. In parts of the US you can still find hundreds of these.Its easier and cheaper because its easy to find old, beat-up trucks that are already trashed from years of use.Theres about 10 of these in every small town in places like Montana and Colorado and they tend to be beaten up pretty good and worth virtually nothing. |
◊ 2011-01-04 09:52 |
It's true: there are tons of cheap old Ford trucks in rural parts of the U.S., and there's no real price difference between any 1967-1979 or so. There are 27 F-250s alone within that specific year range on Ebay right now, and another 20 F-100s. |
◊ 2011-01-06 08:32 |
They probably used multiple trucks for stunts.Maybe 3 or 4.This one was probably pre-damaged and cost less than $1000 to obtain.I wouldnt be surprised if it didnt run without being pulled from underneath.It almost looks like there are cables hooked up to the bottom if you look closely. |
◊ 2011-01-12 05:02 |
they used at least three trucks, the 77 f150, a 73-79 3/4 ton when it crashed the car, and this 67 right here, this one looks like they just got something outof a junkyard due to all the rust |