Author | Message |
---|---|
◊ 2011-09-18 14:08 |
![]() -- Last edit: 2012-03-16 11:26:36 |
◊ 2011-09-18 14:11 |
Ural AT-L, I think. |
◊ 2011-09-18 16:32 |
Why Ural? |
◊ 2011-09-18 16:36 |
How should I know? That's how they're listed on the site. Otherwise, ChTZ would be correct? |
◊ 2011-09-18 17:35 |
AT-L was designed and manufactured by KhTZ Link to "www.xtz.ua" in Russian only |
◊ 2011-09-18 22:39 |
So, you contradict to what you said here?: /vehicle_177376-ChTZ-AT-L.html |
◊ 2011-09-19 11:08 |
Yes, they are from KhTZ... |
◊ 2011-09-19 12:29 |
/vehicle_177376-ChTZ-AT-L.html - it's AT-T (based vehicle) not AT-L ChTZ vs KhTZ - well I can't remember now whether it was my wrong transcription or I just thought that manufacturer was ChTZ (Chelyabinsk plant)...anyway, my bad. -- Last edit: 2011-09-19 12:42:26 |
◊ 2011-09-19 12:37 |
No, this one is really AT-L. It has smaller cab with lights on fender, not on the top of the hood, like in AT-T, and it has higher load platform. |
◊ 2011-09-19 12:42 |
Jale, chodziło mi o ten link który przesłał Lateef na którym jest BAT-M bazujący na AT-T.. |
◊ 2011-09-19 12:45 |
Nie napisałeś, komu odpowiadasz i wyglądało na to, że chodzi o pojazd ze zdjęcia głównego. ![]() A tamtego przed chwilą zmieniałem z AT-L na AT-T, więc Lateef odnosił się jeszcze do starego wpisu. |
◊ 2011-09-19 12:48 |
Dobra cicho, bo "autorytet" stracę ![]() |
◊ 2011-09-19 12:52 |
To Ci raczej nie grozi. ![]() |