Advertising Last completed movie pages
1953 Cadillac Series 62 Convertible Class: Cars, Convertible — Model origin: 
![[*]](/res/star.png){kind=small}
Background vehicle
Comments about this vehicle| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
◊ 2014-01-12 03:48 |
Early-1950's Cadillac: /vehicle_664547-Chevrolet.html |
|
-- ◊ 2014-01-12 09:58 |
Cadillac 62 DeVille -- Last edit: Mark1994 |
|
◊ 2014-01-12 09:59 |
I think a '53 but I'm not sure... |
|
-- ◊ 2014-01-12 13:07 |
deleted comment |
|
◊ 2014-01-12 20:19 |
m.k., when you make your IDs do you even consider other models or do any research? Or do you, for example, just post the first 1953 Cadillac convertible you find? The 1953 Eldorado was a special limited production model, distinguished by a dip in the beltline and hard tonneau cover for the convertible top among other features. Both of these details are visible on the car you linked. This car in the movie has a straight beltline and no tonneau cover, and therefore is clearly not an Eldorado. |
|
◊ 2014-01-12 20:24 |
MK hor auf mit diese (mis)IDs kannst eben mit diesen Jungs nicht mithalten , wenn du etwas identifizieren willst mach einfach Fahrzeuge die diese Jungs nicht machen wie Gabelstapler |
|
◊ 2014-01-12 20:37 |
Bei anderen Autos kann er das auch nicht, etwa bei VWs oder europäischen Autos der 70er. Er gehört halt zur selben Kategorie wie ein gewisses ungarisches Mitglied oder ein anderer Deutscher (um bei beiden auffälligsten Beispiele zu nennen): die Nichtwisser, von denen die meisten, oft alle "Identifizierungen" korrigiert werden müssen. Ich mache das schon routinemäßig ![[:kiki]](https://imcdb.opencommunity.be/images/smileys/kiki.gif "[:kiki]") |
|
-- ◊ 2014-01-12 21:08 |
deleted comment |
|
◊ 2014-01-12 21:26 |
Bitte, lass diesen gewissen Deutschen nicht mich sein! Ich flehe dich an! -- Last edit: 2014-01-13 16:06:40 |
|
◊ 2014-01-12 21:27 |
Nö. Ich meine Rastaman. Der schreibt nur Stuß. |
|
◊ 2014-01-12 23:14 |
mk lost his german flag in the turmoil. |
|
◊ 2014-01-13 03:58 |
Should I have handled that more tactfully? |
|
◊ 2014-01-13 06:58 |
No, your comment is o.k. It was mike962 and me, who reacted angrily about his unknowing (which he shows not only here, about US-cars from the 50ies. With German cars from the 70ies it's the same. -- Last edit: 2014-01-13 06:59:04 |
|
◊ 2014-01-13 17:42 |
Ingo and m.k. are definitely my dream-team for 2014...  |
|
◊ 2014-01-13 17:44 |
I do not know, he complained that you and Ingo were attacking and destroying people. I know it is true for Ingo, but I didn't see you like that Anyway, case closed (though that Ingo could indeed be more welcoming with new people) -- Last edit: 2014-01-13 17:44:58 |
|
◊ 2014-01-14 03:18 |
He got off on the wrong foot with ingo over Volkswagens, he nearly exited immediately. But admins complained about his identifications too. |
|
◊ 2014-01-14 19:29 |
Check, who always posts a welcome to competent and polite newbies, especially from (for us here) exotic countries.  I was a bit pissed not only about his mainly wrong identifications, also about his bossy reactions, when we (not only me) hat to correct him. It was all about objective mistakes. |
|
◊ 2014-01-14 19:30 |
You only want to divert us from your Rootes-crap-mobbing and Rootes-crap-lover-mobbing |
|
◊ 2014-01-14 20:15 |
No, I'm just glad that you found another sidekick after both Gomsel and Monty had left us so suddenly... |
|
◊ 2014-01-14 20:22 |
Your feelings come too late. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zyn8BJ1Uvzw and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XStDPpOPTBU |
|
◊ 2014-01-15 15:58 |
 Lucilectric?!? Du bist wirklich hart im Nehmen... |
|
◊ 2014-01-15 17:23 |
To competent ones, yes, but the incompetent can also improve -- Last edit: 2014-01-15 17:23:58 |
|
◊ 2014-01-15 19:39 |
Das höre ich ich nicht, das verlinke ich nur. Für dich P.S: Nicht vergessen:  TV-alert for the German-speaking people here, next Sunday at 18:00 on ZDF: Link to "www.spiegel.de" -- Last edit: 2014-01-15 19:57:04 |
Add a comment Advertising Advertising
