Class: Cars, Hatchback — Model origin: — Made for:
Background vehicle
Author | Message |
---|---|
◊ 2022-01-17 03:49 |
1.0 SE |
◊ 2023-09-07 01:45 |
@alex can you pull this? A 2005 should be a Chevrolet unless a fairly late built Daewoo. Switch was mid-2005. |
◊ 2023-09-07 14:24 |
WG05KZA Chevrolet Matiz 1.0 SE 5d 2005/05 Date of registration: 30 Jun 2005 Fuel type: Petrol VIN KL1KF480J5C022813 Country of origin SOUTH KOREA Brand CHEVROLET Name MATIZ + SPARK (M200) [EUR] Vin KL1KF480J5C022813 Production 27.04.2005 EngineNo 206590KA2 Engine (LQ4) ENGINE-4 CYL 1.0 SOHC Transmission (M81) TRANS-MAN,5 SPEED,Y4M Country UE EngineStyle B10S1 CocCode A5MC51C TrimLevel M Year 2006 TrimCode 82I BodyStyle 48 Drive RHD |
◊ 2023-09-07 15:17 |
Thanks ![]() |
◊ 2023-09-07 15:19 |
VIN check says M200, but I'm sure this is an M150 ![]() |
◊ 2023-09-07 15:30 |
Indeed. Then, really Chevrolet-badged M150s are 2006MY? This would change a lot in our database, since we have not only M150 Chevrolets as 2005, but even most M200s are listed as first year 2005 ![]() |
◊ 2023-09-07 15:30 |
It's a little strange that an April built unit is already considered 2006 ![]() |
◊ 2023-09-07 15:35 |
Indeed I'd agree with you. Then, we have some Daewoo badged ones as 2005 (by VIN) too in the database ![]() |
◊ 2023-09-07 15:47 |
We have had an instance where this occurred before with the 10th digit being the year of manufacture vs the model year. GM Daewoo did this on the next generation as well. I would go off the year input by the decoder and not necessarily the 10th digit. Ford does this too in EU where they assign the 10th digit as the year of manufacture and not the MY assigned to the vehicle. |