Author | Message |
---|---|
◊ 2008-01-09 21:19 |
many 50s cars seems difficult to identify, isn´t? |
◊ 2008-01-09 21:20 |
At least for me yes ![]() |
◊ 2008-01-09 21:26 |
This is where I step in ![]() |
◊ 2008-01-09 22:53 |
Just a crash with the Blue Bird ![]() |
◊ 2008-01-09 23:36 |
![]() ![]() |
◊ 2008-01-10 01:36 |
Yeah 50's cars are hard to identify. It seems almost all cars had 2 round headlights. No variation in headlamp shape or placement on front end. |
◊ 2008-01-10 01:47 |
In the film "Loser", the video store clerk (David Spade) recommends this film to Jason Biggs as a good date movie ("It's about a goofy little kid with problems"). I always thought that was a good joke ![]() |
◊ 2008-01-10 01:51 |
Boy did you stir up a hornet's nest! Try these and tell me they look alike! /images/086/988.jpg /images/090/499.jpg I agree that mid 50s (55-57) cars are hard to tell apart without the right amount of distance, because the Big Three shared many components among their own individual divisions. -- Last edit: 2008-01-10 01:54:16 |