Advertising

Last completed movie pages

Un cuento chino, Movie, 2011 IMDB

Pictures provided by: afonso

Display options:

Also known as:

  • A Chinese Tale


Where to find this title?

Watch or buy this title via JustWatch

Comments about this movie

See all comments about this movie and its vehicles

AuthorMessage

Neon IT

2011-07-05 12:55

Who has validated this? There were a lot of others car definitely worth listing that have been deleted!

chicomarx BE

2011-07-05 17:52

Unless the rules have been changed passing traffic is only worth a page when it's a rare/unusual car.

chicomarx BE

2011-07-05 18:11

... but no worries, afonso submitted them all again....

/vehicle_413267-Peugeot-206.html
/vehicle_413268-Peugeot-307.html

It doesn't help that all admins aren't on the same line.

owlman US

2011-07-05 19:52

I thought that rule was only for documentaries and music videos?

tonkatracker US

2011-07-05 20:28

Indeed if this is a normal movie, passing traffic is acceptable.

chicomarx BE

2011-07-05 20:28

That rule always applies, otherwise every parked car can be posted.

FAQ: "Avoid posting pictures of vehicles that are seen for an extremely short time"

plus there you have examples of what could be considered rare.

chicomarx BE

2011-07-05 20:30

tonkatracker wrote passing traffic is acceptable.

Then things have changed a lot since I started...

tonkatracker US

2011-07-05 20:33

The site started listing background vehicles a long time ago (before I joined in 2006)

chicomarx BE

2011-07-05 20:43

Background vehicles "that have an interest", what would be the point of filling a database with traffic??

Gomselmash11

2011-07-05 20:45

"interesting" depends the admin...

Ford_Guy US

2011-07-05 20:55

The way I understood it is that apart form "interesting/rare" vehicles, a background traffic car can be added if it is clearly visible, even if just for a second or a few seconds. Something like this for example:

/vehicle_359961-Dodge-Caliber-2007.html

Some contributors and administrators go overboard with this IMHO but it is more or less about using common sense.

chicomarx BE

2011-07-05 21:17

Yes, that's well visible. It's usually not that difficult... a blurry car in traffic of a common make, with hundreds listed already, has no interest. And when in doubt I keep it, I only remove the worst. But some admins here upload anything.

tonkatracker US

2011-07-05 21:20

chicomarx wrote Yes, that's well visible. It's usually not that difficult... a blurry car in traffic of a common make, with hundreds listed already, has no interest. And when in doubt I keep it, I only remove the worst. But some admins here upload anything.


I agree with this statement 100%, I thought you were saying that no one-star cars were allowed.

Neon IT

2011-07-06 00:13

chicomarx wrote Unless the rules have been changed passing traffic is only worth a page when it's a rare/unusual car.

This: /vehicle_413273-Ford-Escort.html and this one: /vehicle_413275-Mercedes-Benz-Sprint-T1N.html are perfectly visible and almost in foreground; I don't see any reason for delete them :??:
I think that you are way too severe with the validation of the users's contributions but not on your contributions: /vehicle_389075-Lada-110-2110-1996.html :whistle:

-- Last edit: 2011-07-06 00:14:11

chicomarx BE

2011-07-06 00:36

Neon wrote I think that you are way too severe with the validation of the users's contributions but not on your contributions: /vehicle_389075-Lada-110-2110-1996.html :whistle:

That movie page /movie_1127877-Cold-Souls.html looks fine IMO. The Lada wasn't necessary, but you did go back to April to find it.

I let many many through that I would never upload myself...

vilero ES

2011-07-06 11:48

I had not seen this discussion and:
- this is not the place for that.
- even I had not seen this discussion, this is my comment about this problem I have written this same morning /movie_84412-Night-Shift.html just few minutes ago.
- To me what an admin does is well done. On the contrary we will be always 're-editing' 're-validating' contributions. I can't remember now what contribution was validated by chicomarx some months ago, but I remember well that, at the same time, I was checking the same contribution. Well, chico validated some vehicles and deleted some others. He validated some vehicles that I would had deleted and he deleted some that I would had validated. It was his decision and, to me, it was OK.
- Going to the dentist :cry: see you later...

afonso BR

2011-07-09 00:44

[Image: unche.7018.jpg]
Background Cars
[Image: cliopo.1260.jpg] [Image: corokka.7255.jpg] [Image: fit014.4428.jpg] [Image: foucs.6545.jpg] [Image: kwdu.5655.jpg] [Image: 78694492.6263.jpg] [Image: onal.3581.jpg] [Image: 206ba.1144.jpg] [Image: 3077y.9889.jpg]
[*][*]
[Image: bxd.6626.jpg]
For impdb.org
[Image: aviav.1627.jpg]

Gomselmash11

2011-07-09 01:29

1º Renault Clio 1. 2º Toyota Corolla. 3º Honda Fit. 4º Ford Focus MKII 5º 1992 Renault 9 6º VW New Beetle. 7º Mercedes-Benz OH ¿1621? (Worth listing, IMHO) and in the right, Renault 19 Série 2. 8º y 9º Peugeot 206 and 307. 10º Fiat ¿Duna? or ¿Uno?

sixcyl FR

2011-12-05 19:57

Aircraft at:
http://www.impdb.org/index.php?title=Un_cuento_chino

franchumar AR

2024-12-15 21:23

afonso wrote [Image: unche.7018.jpg]
Background Cars
[Image: cliopo.1260.jpg] [Image: corokka.7255.jpg] [Image: fit014.4428.jpg] [Image: foucs.6545.jpg] [Image: kwdu.5655.jpg] [Image: 78694492.6263.jpg] [Image: onal.3581.jpg] [Image: 206ba.1144.jpg] [Image: 3077y.9889.jpg]
[*][*]
[Image: bxd.6626.jpg]
For impdb.org
[Image: aviav.1627.jpg]

I find this one:
[Image: descarga9.jpg]

lukapavosevic HR

2024-12-15 21:28

franchumar wrote
I find this one:
[Image: descarga9.jpg]

I think this car is already listed

Add a comment

Advertising