Author | Message |
---|---|
◊ 2011-07-05 12:55 |
Who has validated this? There were a lot of others car definitely worth listing that have been deleted! |
◊ 2011-07-05 17:52 |
Unless the rules have been changed passing traffic is only worth a page when it's a rare/unusual car. |
◊ 2011-07-05 18:11 |
... but no worries, afonso submitted them all again.... /vehicle_413267-Peugeot-206.html /vehicle_413268-Peugeot-307.html It doesn't help that all admins aren't on the same line. |
◊ 2011-07-05 19:52 |
I thought that rule was only for documentaries and music videos? |
◊ 2011-07-05 20:28 |
Indeed if this is a normal movie, passing traffic is acceptable. |
◊ 2011-07-05 20:28 |
That rule always applies, otherwise every parked car can be posted. FAQ: "Avoid posting pictures of vehicles that are seen for an extremely short time" plus there you have examples of what could be considered rare. |
◊ 2011-07-05 20:30 |
Then things have changed a lot since I started... |
◊ 2011-07-05 20:33 |
The site started listing background vehicles a long time ago (before I joined in 2006) |
◊ 2011-07-05 20:43 |
Background vehicles "that have an interest", what would be the point of filling a database with traffic?? |
Gomselmash11 ◊ 2011-07-05 20:45 |
"interesting" depends the admin... |
◊ 2011-07-05 20:55 |
The way I understood it is that apart form "interesting/rare" vehicles, a background traffic car can be added if it is clearly visible, even if just for a second or a few seconds. Something like this for example: /vehicle_359961-Dodge-Caliber-2007.html Some contributors and administrators go overboard with this IMHO but it is more or less about using common sense. |
◊ 2011-07-05 21:17 |
Yes, that's well visible. It's usually not that difficult... a blurry car in traffic of a common make, with hundreds listed already, has no interest. And when in doubt I keep it, I only remove the worst. But some admins here upload anything. |
◊ 2011-07-05 21:20 |
I agree with this statement 100%, I thought you were saying that no one-star cars were allowed. |
◊ 2011-07-06 00:13 |
This: /vehicle_413273-Ford-Escort.html and this one: /vehicle_413275-Mercedes-Benz-Sprint-T1N.html are perfectly visible and almost in foreground; I don't see any reason for delete them ![]() I think that you are way too severe with the validation of the users's contributions but not on your contributions: /vehicle_389075-Lada-110-2110-1996.html ![]() -- Last edit: 2011-07-06 00:14:11 |
◊ 2011-07-06 00:36 |
That movie page /movie_1127877-Cold-Souls.html looks fine IMO. The Lada wasn't necessary, but you did go back to April to find it. I let many many through that I would never upload myself... |
◊ 2011-07-06 11:48 |
I had not seen this discussion and: - this is not the place for that. - even I had not seen this discussion, this is my comment about this problem I have written this same morning /movie_84412-Night-Shift.html just few minutes ago. - To me what an admin does is well done. On the contrary we will be always 're-editing' 're-validating' contributions. I can't remember now what contribution was validated by chicomarx some months ago, but I remember well that, at the same time, I was checking the same contribution. Well, chico validated some vehicles and deleted some others. He validated some vehicles that I would had deleted and he deleted some that I would had validated. It was his decision and, to me, it was OK. - Going to the dentist ![]() |
◊ 2011-07-09 00:44 |
![]() Background Cars ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() For impdb.org ![]() |
Gomselmash11 ◊ 2011-07-09 01:29 |
1º Renault Clio 1. 2º Toyota Corolla. 3º Honda Fit. 4º Ford Focus MKII 5º 1992 Renault 9 6º VW New Beetle. 7º Mercedes-Benz OH ¿1621? (Worth listing, IMHO) and in the right, Renault 19 Série 2. 8º y 9º Peugeot 206 and 307. 10º Fiat ¿Duna? or ¿Uno? |
◊ 2011-12-05 19:57 |
Aircraft at: http://www.impdb.org/index.php?title=Un_cuento_chino |
◊ 2024-12-15 21:23 |
I find this one: ![]() |
◊ 2024-12-15 21:28 |
I think this car is already listed |