Advertising Last completed movie pages
1993 Honda Prelude 2.2i-VTEC 4WS [BB1] Class: Cars, Coupé — Model origin: 
— Made for: 
![1993 Honda Prelude 2.2i-VTEC 4WS [BB1]](/i001427741.jpg)
00:18:13 ![[*]](/res/star.png){kind=small}
Background vehicle
Comments about this vehicle| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
◊ 2020-09-18 21:05 |
![[Image: hondapreludeii001814.jpg]](http://pics.imcdb.org/26849/hondapreludeii001814.jpg) L559 GTM ✗ Untaxed Tax due: 1 July 2006 Vehicle make HONDA Date of first registration September 1993 Year of manufacture 1993 Cylinder capacity 2198 cc Export marker No Vehicle status Untaxed Vehicle colour RED |
|
◊ 2020-09-18 21:17 |
Indeed [BB1].![[Image: 8989f832-c7db-43a9-946b-ee3120d4c179.jpg]](http://pics.imcdb.org/19003/8989f832-c7db-43a9-946b-ee3120d4c179.jpg) Screw thanks for uploading complete entries. Really glad you received admin status. Really disheartening as an admin to log in to see new entries with ‘unknowns’ galore. Edit: wait could this be [BB4]? [BB1] is 2.2 with 4WS. [BB4] is 2.2 without 4WS. -- Last edit: 2020-09-18 21:18:28 |
|
◊ 2020-09-18 21:42 |
Oops, my mistake. Should have left BB as default .gif ":)") |
|
◊ 2020-09-18 21:45 |
Question. Does the plate check tell us IF the vehicle has 4WS? |
|
◊ 2020-09-18 21:45 |
Was there the 2.2 without 4WS in UK? I'm saying this because in Italy the 2.2 was imported only with 4WS |
|
◊ 2020-09-18 21:47 |
As far as I can find UK Preludes were always 4WS on the 2.2 and 2.3: https://www.parkers.co.uk/honda/prelude/coupe-1992/specs/ -- Last edit: 2020-09-18 21:48:03 |
|
◊ 2020-09-18 21:48 |
Thank you gentlemen. Indeed back to [BB1]. |
|
◊ 2020-09-18 22:04 |
Can't agree with you there. My whole interest on this site is in identifying stuff. I very rarely watch films and fiction, so do not know anything about it, can't stand modern culture so know nothing to post, plus the fact that I am not computer literate, so I prefer to respond and there seem fewer and fewer chances so to do. I also try to do everything from memory, only going to the books just before posting my views to try to keep errors to a minimum. This is all an exercise to attempt to fight off dementia by brain activity in some subject in which I have an interest, -- Last edit: 2020-09-18 23:04:18 |
|
◊ 2020-09-19 01:43 |
All I can suggest is don't be disheartened. Our fuel is people having the dedication to post things. If we had a ruling against posting films where the poster does not know the IDs, then we'd lose a lot of additions. And we'd deprive folk who are mainly spotters of the opportunity to contribute their talents and enthusiasm, as jfs says. So films with lots of unknowns are just as important as films which arrive with fully oven-ready IDs. We need both. |
|
◊ 2020-09-19 02:22 |
its the same reason that makes me leave some blanks spots ( mostly year ) on my contributions , so people can participate like jfs said, i like to go by memory too ... but starting to realize i should have read the words that goes with the pics in my books..  |
|
◊ 2020-09-19 11:05 |
Has it occurred to think that if every film were to be posted complete and "oven ready" then participation would thereafter become restricted to perhaps ten or a dozen proponents. I for one would have gone elsewhere. |
|
◊ 2020-09-19 12:45 |
Well said, John. Incidentally that's a London Buses M class MCW Metrobus out of Brixton in background. |
|
◊ 2020-09-19 13:09 |
Bit modern for me, Steve. Thanks for your support. |
|
◊ 2020-12-06 07:13 |
Late to the party here but the ' unknowns' and identifying are the fun of this site to me, otherwise would be a quite boring list of mainly mundane vehicles with much fewer comments. -- Last edit: 2020-12-06 07:15:35 |
|
◊ 2020-12-06 09:41 |
Hear hear! |
Add a comment Advertising Advertising
