Class: Others, Military armored vehicle — Model origin: — Built in:
00:25:19
Background vehicle
Author | Message |
---|---|
◊ 2022-08-23 23:05 |
Looks like OT-64 SKOT or its variant |
◊ 2022-08-23 23:08 |
czech docu so assume czech made so this for designation /vehicle_592279-Tatra-OT-64-1964.html |
◊ 2022-08-24 11:36 |
SKOT's were assembled in Poland only. Besides, during 1968 intervention they were also used by Polish forces (this one, however, doesn't loook like Polish one). |
◊ 2022-08-24 12:46 |
but here they say both did it essentially http://www.army-guide.com/eng/product1067.html -- Last edit: 2022-08-24 12:49:22 |
◊ 2022-08-24 15:00 |
So they are all wrong. First, body and weapons were manufactured by another Polish companies, and FSC only assemblied the vehicles (with Czech supplied parts) for both Poland and Czechoslovakia. -- Last edit: 2022-08-24 15:55:19 |
◊ 2022-08-25 00:13 |
so what you suggest ?? that all currently named with Tatra be changed ?? /vehicles_make-Tatra_model-OT.html |
◊ 2022-08-25 15:14 |
Yes, given the fact that they were finally assembled by FSC. |
◊ 2022-08-26 13:11 |
![]() |
◊ 2022-08-30 23:49 |
"1964 Tatra OT-64 FSC Lublin 'SKOT'" - I don't get it. FSC Lublin was the actual make, not Tatra. Putting is as the alternative name for the vehicle is a strange choice. |
◊ 2022-08-31 00:04 |
With its pretty unique origin isn't 'Tatra' brand, or 'Lublin' as well. Maybe the best way is choose its own some-kind-of-brand 'SKOT'. ![]() |
◊ 2022-08-31 12:32 |
We have many vehicles here with such complicated origins, in such cases the make should be the same as the final manufacturer/assembler - FSC in this case, and model origin CS/PL. Nah. So for Polish-used ones it would be "1963 SKOT SKOT 2AP", a total and utter nonsense. |