Class: Trucks, Simple truck — Model origin:
Background vehicle
Author | Message |
---|---|
◊ 2009-05-26 17:31 |
Model origin = China? Or model origin = Japan (looks like Japanese truck), Built in = China? -- Last edit: 2009-05-26 17:46:08 |
◊ 2009-05-26 17:55 |
Looks like Jiefang 141 (later with inscription FAW instead Jiefang) - Link to "xjyndj.en.china.cn" But - on IMCDB, identic truck was listed as FAW: /vehicle_165258-FAW-CA-Series.html And now - maybe should be Jiefang listed as FAW-Jiefang? Like FAW-Volkswagen? Because Jiefang belong to FAW? |
◊ 2009-05-26 18:43 |
Listed as Jiefang like Hongqi? (Hongqi belong to FAW too) (I think some trucks are named "FAW" and some trucks are "Jiefang".) -- Last edit: 2009-05-26 18:44:07 |
◊ 2009-05-26 18:56 |
Jiefang (liberation) was the original name for FAW's trucks, chosen by Mao Zedong himself. Link to "www.faw.com" |
◊ 2009-05-26 20:16 |
CA 20? edit: no, that's FAW?. -- Last edit: 2009-05-26 20:17:02 |
◊ 2009-06-17 18:33 |
Now my answer is model origin = China. Because some (I mean "not all") Chinese trucks (Dongfeng,FAW,Jiefang,etc.)in IMCDB are looks like Japanese trucks and listed as Chinese trucks. -- Last edit: 2009-06-17 18:35:24 |
◊ 2009-06-18 23:57 |
Annother question is (a question about ALL Chinese cars), if they are officially assembled as Joint Ventures or just illegal copies. ![]() Shall we make differences then in the question of "orign" ![]() -- Last edit: 2009-06-18 23:58:58 |
◊ 2009-06-18 23:59 |
If they're copies, therefore not official, they cannot be labeled as the origin of the copied car, it's not like they're rebadged, just copied, so their origin is China still. |
◊ 2009-06-19 12:00 |
Indeed, if they are visual copies they could be considered as really Chinese vehicles. |
-- ◊ 2010-12-31 23:02 |
Jiefang CA 141 http://www.molds.cn/html/2008/12/03095925205.htm http://www.360che.com/news/100301/9266.html |
◊ 2020-02-22 08:16 |
1987+ |