Class: Trucks, Simple truck — Model origin:
Minor action vehicle or used in only a short scene
Author | Message |
---|---|
◊ 2016-04-15 10:21 |
C-20 or C-30?![]() ![]() -- Last edit: 2016-04-15 11:10:10 |
◊ 2016-04-15 12:29 |
Seems like a heavy configuration, i guess C-30 with a 1971-72 grille. |
◊ 2016-04-15 13:30 |
Well it is a definitely a 1971/72 model, and it does resemble a heavier duty model, I agree there. |
◊ 2016-04-15 18:22 |
Since I can't see the rear view mirror and the grille detail clearly, I would go for 1971/72 Chevrolet C-Series since there was such C-30 and C-40 weight class sold at that time. |
◊ 2016-04-17 03:18 |
You're certainly confusing with the 1960-62 C-40, which has indeed the light-duty cab. The 1½-ton model of the 1967-72 generation was part of the medium-duty truck line. Only 2 stakes were available within the 1967-72 Chevrolet light-duty truck line: ![]() (Excerpt from the 1967 brochure) Both models could have dual rear wheels, but due to the height of its stake racks and the shape of its wheel rims (see night cub's thumbs), the truck of the main screenshot can't be nothing else than a C-30, which implies a CS/CE31009 model code. -- Last edit: 2016-04-17 03:28:11 |
◊ 2016-04-18 00:45 |
Here is the reference I found in the George H. Dammann book on '75 years of Chevrolet', page 401 containing the caption on 1972 Chevrolet C-30 Stake platform: |
◊ 2016-04-20 01:42 |
@ rjluna2: Clearly another error in your reference book, as: ![]() ![]() (1971 & 1972 Chevrolet C-40 to C-60 brochure covers) As you can see, the C-40 model name was used for a model which has the medium-duty cab. The mentioned wheelbase and bed lengths are indeed the ones of the "big" C-Series (see the link to the 1967 medium-duty brochure in my previous comment), but the 1967-72 C-40 never used the light-duty cab (unlike the 1960-62 model, as already said). -- Last edit: 2016-04-20 01:44:43 |
◊ 2016-04-20 02:30 |
@eLMeR: What the author has implied for the light duty truck series compare to the medium duty as you described. Read the last sentence at the quote ![]() |
◊ 2016-04-23 02:10 |
I read: Unless I misunderstand what is written, I see here an obvious error: as already said twice, the 1967-72 C-40 never used any of the two mentioned items... -- Last edit: 2016-04-23 02:28:03 |